Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the vivo X50, with a score of 98.9 against 73. Despite being the best in this review, we must tell that it is also just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while vivo X50 has Android 10 version, providing you a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit superior CPU than vivo X50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better looking display than vivo X50, because it has a better pixel quantity per screen inch, a quite larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a greater camera than vivo X50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for taking pictures or video in low light environments, it also counts with a much larger sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality, a way more megapixels back facing camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than vivo X50, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit longer battery duration than vivo X50, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.