Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is much better than the vivo X50's 73 global score. Galaxy Note 3 is an a lot older and just a little bit thicker cellphone than vivo X50, but Samsung was able to build it just a little bit lighter anyway. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while vivo X50 has Android 10 version.
The vivo X50 has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and also faster) and 5 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little sharper display than vivo X50, although it has a little inferior count of pixels per display inch, a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a bit smaller screen.
The vivo X50 features a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Vivo X50 counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
The vivo X50 features a better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the vivo X50 also has a larger sensor which gives a better photo and video quality, a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a much bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.