Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is much better than the vivo X50's overall score of 73. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is much older and a little thicker than vivo X50, it's body is still just a little lighter. The vivo X50 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a slightly better screen than vivo X50, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixels count per display inch. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a slightly better storage capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X50, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The vivo X50 counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4200mAh battery size. The vivo X50 takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the vivo X50 also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a way more MP back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.