Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is way better than vivo X50's 73 general score. The Galaxy Note10 body is a little lighter than the vivo X50, although it is a bit thicker and was released around 11 months before. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has just a little better processing power than vivo X50. Both have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM.
Galaxy Note10 has a display that's just as good as the vivo X50 one, because although the Galaxy Note10 has a bit worse 1080 x 2280px resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater screen pixels density. Vivo X50 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and photos, a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X50 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy Note10 features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than vivo X50, because it has more internal storage. The vivo X50 counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.