Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than the vivo X50, with a global score of 86.2 against 73. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note10 Lite has newer 11 version and vivo X50 has Android 10. Even being the best device in this comparison review, Galaxy Note10 Lite's design is heavier and somewhat thicker than vivo X50.
Galaxy Note10 Lite features a screen that's just as good as vivo X50's screen, because although the Galaxy Note10 Lite has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a much better memory capacity for apps and games than vivo X50, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit superior CPU than vivo X50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X50 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a tinier sensor giving a lower image quality and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X50 also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and video and a back camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little better battery lifetime than vivo X50, because it has a 7% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.