Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note3 is a bit better than the vivo X50, having a global score of 77.7 against 73. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note3 is a lot older and a little bit thicker than the vivo X50, it's design is still a little bit lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a newer 4.4.2 version and vivo X50 has Android 10 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features.
The vivo X50 has a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note3, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. The vivo X50 features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger display, a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better 1080 x 2376px resolution.
Vivo X50 has a much better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the vivo X50 also has a much larger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light situations, a bigger sensor and a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The vivo X50 features just a bit more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The vivo X50 counts with greater battery life than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.