Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a general score of 77.6, which is slightly better than vivo X50's score of 73. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 is a much older, a little thicker and just a bit heavier phone than the vivo X50. Galaxy Note4 has just a bit better looking display than vivo X50, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The vivo X50 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 also has a greater amount of RAM. The vivo X50 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note4, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the vivo X50 also counts with a much larger aperture to capture better captures in low light environments and a camera in the back with a way better 48 megapixels resolution.
Vivo X50 has a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note4, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X50 features improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 3220mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.