Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note7 is a little bit better than vivo X50, getting a 79.5 score against 73. The Galaxy Note7 is a noticeably older and just a little thicker phone than the vivo X50, but Samsung managed to make it a little lighter anyway. Galaxy Note7 counts with a little sharper display than vivo X50, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The vivo X50 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster) and 4 GB more RAM memory. The vivo X50 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the vivo X50 also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better captures in low light environments and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 48 MP resolution.
Galaxy Note7 features just a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X50, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 256 GB. Vivo X50 has greater battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 20% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.