Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is much better than the vivo X50, with an 88.3 score against 73. Both devices in this review have Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 has newer 11 version while vivo X50 has Android 10 version, giving you some additional features and performance enhancements. Galaxy S10's design is lighter than vivo X50, although it's a bit thicker and was released only 17 months before.
The Galaxy S10 has a bit better display than vivo X50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a higher pixel count in each inch of screen. Galaxy S10 has a bit superior processor than vivo X50. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
Vivo X50 features a bit better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has lower video frame rates, a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and images and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X50 also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
The Galaxy S10 has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X50, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S10 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The vivo X50 has better battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.