Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is a lot better than vivo X50's general score of 73. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 5G has a newer 11 version and vivo X50 has Android 10 version. Although it's the best in this comparison review, we must highlight that it is also an older, somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a bit more powerful processor than vivo X50. Both have a 8 GB RAM and the same number of cores. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than vivo X50, because it has a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen, a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than vivo X50, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has just a little better battery lifetime than vivo X50, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh. The vivo X50 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video, lower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X50 also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.