Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is a lot better than vivo X50, with a global score of 89.7 against 73. Even being the best cellphone in this review, the Galaxy S10 Lite design is just a bit heavier and a little thicker than vivo X50. Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit faster CPU than vivo X50. Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Vivo X50 and Galaxy S10 Lite count with incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy S10 Lite has a quite worse display pixels density, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy S10 Lite has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X50, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit longer battery duration than vivo X50, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4200mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos in poorly lited situations, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with higher video frame rate and a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.