Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is much better than vivo X50's general score of 73. The Samsung Galaxy S10e body is somewhat lighter than vivo X50, although it's a little thicker and was released just a bit further than a year before. The Galaxy S10e counts with a bit superior processor than vivo X50, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a little sharper screen than vivo X50, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher number of pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy S10e counts with a lot bigger memory for applications and games than vivo X50, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S10e also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Vivo X50 counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking pictures and video in low light environments, a tinier back camera sensor and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the vivo X50 also counts with a back camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution.
The vivo X50 counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.