Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is way better than the vivo X50, with a 90.8 score against 73. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a better device than vivo X50, we must note that it's also a a little heavier and just a bit thicker device. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version and vivo X50 has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better looking display than vivo X50, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit better pixels number per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a superior memory to store more games and applications than vivo X50, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with just a little better hardware performance than vivo X50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit superior battery life than vivo X50, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Vivo X50 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a way tinier sensor taking less light and washed colors and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X50 also counts with a bigger aperture and a camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.