Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than vivo X50, having a score of 98 against 73. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and vivo X50 has Android 10 version, so it counts with some additional features and enhanced performance. Even being the best we compare here, it must be noted that it is also thicker and a lot heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little sharper display than vivo X50, because it has a quite larger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a better pixel count per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X50, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little bit better processing power than vivo X50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with greater battery performance than vivo X50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.