Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Phantom black and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 Ultra has a global score of 98.1, which is much better than the vivo X50's global score of 73. Galaxy S21 Ultra is a better phone than vivo X50, we must tell that it is also heavier and somewhat thicker. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S21 Ultra has a more recent 11 version and vivo X50 has Android 10 version, so it provides you some nice extra features and performance optimizations.
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a much better looking screen than vivo X50, because it has a little larger display, a greater count of pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution. The Galaxy S21 Ultra and vivo X50 count with quite similar memory capacity to store more apps and games, both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a little faster CPU than vivo X50, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S21 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S21 Ultra has a much better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much more MP camera in the back and a lot larger camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with better battery performance than vivo X50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.