Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is way better than vivo X50, having a global score of 93.4 against 73. The Galaxy S22 body has the same thickness than the vivo X50, but it's just a little bit lighter. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version while vivo X50 has Android 10, so it gives you some nice extra features and performance tweaks.
Galaxy S22's CPU is very similar to the vivo X50 one, both have 8 cores and a 8 GB RAM. The Galaxy S22 has a much sharper screen than vivo X50, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher display pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a superior camera than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much higher video quality and a back-facing camera with more mega pixels. The vivo X50 and the Galaxy S22 have extremely similar memory to store more games and applications, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The vivo X50 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.