Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than vivo X50, getting a 95.4 score against 73. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer cellphone than vivo X50, although it is somewhat thicker and much heavier. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and vivo X50 has Android 10 version, counting with some extra features and enhanced performance.
Vivo X50 features just a little better processing power than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an incredibly better looking screen than vivo X50, because it has more pixels per display inch, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a little bit larger display.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos and videos, a camera with a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution and a way better video resolution.
Vivo X50 and Galaxy S22 Ultra both have very similar memory capacity for games and applications, both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with longer battery performance than vivo X50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.