Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-24 | -- |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.16 ounces | -- |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is much better than the vivo X50's general score of 73. The Galaxy S25 is a a lot lighter and a lot thinner device than vivo X50. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 has a newer 14 version and vivo X50 has Android 10.
Vivo X50 has a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a more vivid screen than vivo X50, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels density.
The Galaxy S25 counts with as much storage to store more apps and games as vivo X50, both of them have equal internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 has a better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a way larger sensor and a camera with more MP.
The vivo X50 features just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.