Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-24 | -- |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.16 ounces | -- |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is way better than vivo X50's overall score of 73. Both devices we compare here include Android OS, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version and vivo X50 has Android 10, providing some additional features and a performance increase. Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is notably lighter and incredibly thinner than vivo X50.
The vivo X50 has an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a lot better looking display than vivo X50, because it has a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a little bit larger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has much more memory to install applications and games than vivo X50, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots way better photos and videos than vivo X50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures, it also counts with a much higher video definition, a lot larger sensor and a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has longer battery lifetime than vivo X50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.