| Global Score | |
| 73 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2013-03-14 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Polycarbonate |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Galaxy S4 is a bit better than the vivo X50, having a general score of 79 against 73. Although the Galaxy S4 is way older and a little thicker than the vivo X50, it's construction is still notably lighter. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Galaxy S4 has older 4.4 version and vivo X50 has Android 10 version.
The vivo X50 features a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S4, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and 6 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S4 has a better looking screen than vivo X50, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixel density.
The vivo X50 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy S4, because it has a lot larger camera aperture, a way better video definition, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a larger camera sensor. The vivo X50 has a slightly bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S4, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The vivo X50 counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S4, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.