Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S5
32 GBSM-G901F
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Blue, Gold, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 is better than the vivo X50, with a overall score of 80.8 against 73. Galaxy S5's design is somewhat lighter than vivo X50, although it is a bit thicker and was released many years before. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S5 has the newer 4.4.2 version and vivo X50 has Android 10, so it provides some nice extra features.
Galaxy S5 counts with a processor that is just as good as the vivo X50 one, because although the Galaxy S5 has less cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Galaxy S5 has a sharper display than vivo X50, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display.
The vivo X50 counts with a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S5, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X50 captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy S5, because although it has a tinier camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the vivo X50 also counts with a much larger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
Vivo X50 has a superior battery performance than Galaxy S5, because it has a 50% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.