| Global Score | |
| 73 | 87.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2015-04-11 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 252.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2550mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Galaxy S6 has an overall score of 87.4, which is better than vivo X50's general score of 73. Although Galaxy S6 is incredibly older than the vivo X50, it's construction is extremely lighter and just a little bit thinner. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S6 has the older 5.0 version and vivo X50 has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 counts with a much more vibrant screen than vivo X50, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per inch of display and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. Vivo X50 and Galaxy S6 feature incredibly similar storage to install applications and games, both have the same internal storage.
The Galaxy S6 features a bit better processing unit than vivo X50, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 also counts with a graphics processor and a 64 bits processor. Vivo X50 counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S6, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X50 also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low light photos and video and a lot more mega pixels camera.
The vivo X50 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.