Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than the vivo X50's general score of 73. Although the Samsung Galaxy S7 is older and a little bit thicker than vivo X50, it's body is still lighter. The Galaxy S7 features a sharper display than vivo X50, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
Vivo X50 features a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Vivo X50 counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster) and 4 GB more RAM memory.
The vivo X50 features a much better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X50 also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The vivo X50 features a superior battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a 40% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.