Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active has a general score of 75.8, which is a bit better than vivo X50's score of 73. Although it's the best phone we are comparing, we must note that it's also an extremely older, a lot thicker and just a little heavier phone. The vivo X50 counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores.
Galaxy S7 Active features a better display than vivo X50, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better display density. Vivo X50 captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X50 also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a bigger aperture to take better captures in low light environments.
The vivo X50 has a bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The vivo X50 counts with a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.