Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-07-24 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 edge is a bit better than the vivo X50, with a global score of 78.1 against 73. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version and vivo X50 has Android 10 version. Galaxy S7 edge is a somewhat lighter cellphone than the vivo X50, but both of them have the same thickness.
The vivo X50 features a bit better performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a bit sharper display than vivo X50, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Vivo X50 features more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Vivo X50 features just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 17 percent larger battery capacity.
Vivo X50 shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the vivo X50 also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better images in poorly lited situations and a much more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.