Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is better than vivo X50, having an 81.7 score against 73. Despite of the fact Galaxy S8 is incredibly older and just a little thicker than vivo X50, it's body is still somewhat lighter. Galaxy S8 features a bit more vivid display than vivo X50, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution.
The vivo X50 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X50 also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a little bit more storage to store more games and applications than vivo X50, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 256 GB.
Vivo X50 features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The vivo X50 has a much better camera than Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the vivo X50 also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments and a back camera with a way higher 48 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.