Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has an overall score of 78.1, which is slightly better than the vivo X50's global score of 73. Although the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 and vivo X50 were only released with a couple of months difference, Samsung Galaxy XCover 5's design is somewhat thicker but also a little bit lighter than vivo X50. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has the newer 11 version while vivo X50 has Android 10 version.
The vivo X50 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a higher screen pixel density, a larger screen and a much higher 1080 x 2376 resolution. Vivo X50 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X50 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X50 features a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and video, a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution and a lot better (4K) video definition. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 counts with much more memory to install applications and games than vivo X50, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The vivo X50 has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 40 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.