Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than the vivo X50's 73 score. Galaxy XCover FieldPro is an extremely heavier and noticeably thicker device than the vivo X50. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version while vivo X50 has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little more vivid display than vivo X50, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater pixel count in each inch of display. Vivo X50 and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro both count with quite similar processing units, and although the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X50 has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality and a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bigger storage to store more apps and games than vivo X50, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little better battery life than vivo X50, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.