Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is way better than vivo X50's 73 general score. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version and vivo X50 has Android 10. Although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the vivo X50 were released only a couple of months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is a little bit thinner but also just a little bit heavier.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little sharper display than vivo X50, because it has a little bit bigger display, a quite better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a just a little better pixels density. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X50, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than vivo X50. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores. The vivo X50 features better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 27 percent bigger battery size. Vivo X50 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier back-facing camera sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same video quality, the vivo X50 also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low-light images and a back camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.