Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the vivo X50, getting a 94.6 score against 73. These phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a more recent 11 version while vivo X50 has Android 10. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the vivo X50 were only released with a couple months difference, Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is noticeably heavier but also a little thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better CPU than vivo X50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a display that is very similar to the display in vivo X50, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 and a bigger display.
The vivo X50 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot smaller sensor capturing way worse quality images and videos and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X50 also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and a back facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X50, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better battery duration than vivo X50, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.