Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.22 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is a lot better than vivo X50's score of 73. Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is newer and thinner than vivo X50's, although it is also a lot heavier. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the newer 11 version and vivo X50 has Android 10.
The vivo X50 counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2376px, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels amount per inch of screen. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X50, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little bit better performance than vivo X50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. The vivo X50 takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much bigger camera aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments and a camera in the back with a lot better 48 MP resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a little bit longer battery life than vivo X50, because it has a 5% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.