Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 94.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-01-26 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 2500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 22.92 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia PRO is way better than the vivo X50, getting a score of 94.3 against 73. These devices have the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that. Despite being the best in this comparison review, it must be noted that it's also a lot thicker and incredibly heavier. Sony Xperia PRO counts with just a little better performance than vivo X50. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Sony Xperia PRO features a sharper display than vivo X50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1644 x 3840 resolution and a much greater count of pixels per inch in the screen. Xperia PRO counts with a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than vivo X50, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The vivo X50 features just a little better battery lifetime than Xperia PRO, because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 4000mAh. Vivo X50 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Xperia PRO, because although it has a much smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and dull colors and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X50 also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution and a bigger aperture for better low light images and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.