Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ Premium has a score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than vivo X50's global score of 73. Xperia XZ Premium is a much older, just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker device than the vivo X50. The vivo X50 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Xperia XZ Premium features an incredibly better display than vivo X50, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 2160 x 3840 pixels resolution and a lot higher display pixels density. Sony Xperia XZ Premium has a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than vivo X50, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The vivo X50 takes clearer pictures and videos than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X50 also counts with a larger camera aperture and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
The vivo X50 has greater battery duration than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 30 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.