Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact is just a bit better than the vivo X50, with a 79 score against 73. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while vivo X50 has Android 10, so it counts with a couple nice extra features and better performance. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's body is a little lighter than vivo X50, although it is extremely thicker and was released many years before.
Xperia XZ2 Compact has a little faster processor than vivo X50, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a brighter display than vivo X50, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a quite higher amount of pixels per inch in the display.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with more storage for games and applications than vivo X50, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 400 GB. The vivo X50 has a very superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Vivo X50 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X50 also counts with a larger aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.