Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a general score of 82.2, which is better than the vivo X50's 73 general score. Despite being the best in this comparison review, Xperia XZ2 Premium's construction is older, noticeably heavier and noticeably thicker than vivo X50. Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a bit faster processor than vivo X50, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a much sharper display than vivo X50, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much greater quantity of pixels per screen inch and a much higher 2160 x 3840 pixels resolution. The vivo X50 counts with a little bit better camera than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X50 also counts with a back camera with much more MP and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium features more storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X50, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 400 GB. Vivo X50 features longer battery life than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.