Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z4v is just a bit better than vivo X50, with a overall score of 78.8 against 73. Xperia Z4v's body is just a little bit lighter than vivo X50, although it's thicker and was released many years before. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xperia Z4v has older 5.1 version while vivo X50 has Android 10.
The vivo X50 and the Xperia Z4v both have similar processors, because although the Xperia Z4v has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cores, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. Xperia Z4v counts with a much better screen than vivo X50, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per screen inch and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The vivo X50 features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Vivo X50 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has a smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the vivo X50 also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
The vivo X50 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.