Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than vivo X50, with a 77.8 score against 73. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version while vivo X50 has Android 10 version, so it provides you a couple additional features. Although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is notably heavier than vivo X50, it's extremely thinner and also extremely newer.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better looking screen than vivo X50, because it has a larger display, a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a just a bit better pixel amount per display inch. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X50, because it has more internal memory.
Vivo X50 features a very superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery life than vivo X50, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 4200mAh. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting images and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a back camera with more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.