Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is better than vivo X50, having an 86.6 score against 73. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is an a lot thicker and incredibly heavier phone than vivo X50. Both phones in this review use the same Android 10 OS, so both of them should provide identical operating system features.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 and vivo X50 have really similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a just a little lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 and vivo X50 have really similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, they have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a little bit better hardware performance than vivo X50. Both have a 8 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a bit superior battery life than vivo X50, because it has 4720mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a much better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking pictures or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a lot larger sensor capturing much higher quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.