Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a score of 81.4, which is much better than the vivo X50's global score of 73. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has 9.0 Pie version and vivo X50 has Android 10, so it counts with some additional features and performance tweaks. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's design is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than vivo X50, although it was released around a year before.
The vivo X50 features a little faster processor than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X50 also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a bit sharper display than vivo X50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE captures slightly better videos and photos than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same resolution back camera and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a way larger camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE and vivo X50 both feature incredibly similar storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, they have equal internal storage. Vivo X50 features a really longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.