Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T has a general score of 82.2, which is much better than vivo X50's 73 global score. Both devices in our current comparison have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that. Even though the Xiaomi Mi 9T is a better device than vivo X50, it must be noted that it's also older, a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker.
The vivo X50 features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a slightly better screen than vivo X50, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen density.
Xiaomi Mi 9T takes slightly better pictures and videos than vivo X50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same video frame rates and a same resolution camera, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a way larger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T features as much storage to store more games and applications as the vivo X50 one, both of them have the same internal storage. Vivo X50 has a little longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 5 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.