Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is better than the vivo X50, having an 82.7 score against 73. Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro design is older, thicker and a little heavier than vivo X50. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than vivo X50, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little more vivid display than vivo X50, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher screen pixels density. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro takes slightly better pictures and videos than vivo X50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, and they both have the same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with better video frame rate and a lot bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with as much memory for games and applications as vivo X50, they have exactly the same internal storage. Vivo X50 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.