Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is much better than the vivo X50, having an 83.8 score against 73. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's body is extremely older, just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker than the vivo X50. The vivo X50 and the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s both count with extremely similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better number of pixels per inch of display.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with just a little better hardware performance than vivo X50. They have 8 cores and the same RAM amount. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a much better storage for games and applications than vivo X50, because it has more internal storage capacity. Vivo X50 counts with superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Vivo X50 captures much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the vivo X50 also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.