Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Blue and Green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is much better than vivo X50, with a score of 83.8 against 73. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's construction is older, somewhat heavier and a little thicker than vivo X50. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a little bit better looking screen than vivo X50, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than vivo X50, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a bit better hardware performance than vivo X50. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM amount. The vivo X50 counts with better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 31% bigger battery capacity.
The vivo X50 features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X50 also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a larger aperture for better images and video in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.