Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-11-20 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.09 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is much better than the vivo X50, with an 83.7 score against 73. Both phones in our current comparison include the same Android 10 operating system. Even being the best in this review, it must be told that it's also somewhat heavier and extremely thicker. The vivo X50 counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X50 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 features a bit more vivid display than vivo X50, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has a better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting photos and video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 also counts with a camera with a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality photos and videos.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 and vivo X50 have similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has longer battery performance than vivo X50, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.