Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-03-13 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Note 7 Pro is better than vivo X50, getting an 80.5 score against 73. Even being the best we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro construction is older, a little bit thicker and a little heavier than the vivo X50. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro has a newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo X50 has Android 10.
Vivo X50 counts with a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X50 also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Note 7 Pro and vivo X50 count with quite similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little greater display density.
The Xiaomi Note 7 Pro and vivo X50 feature very similar storage capacity to store more apps and games, they have the same 128 GB internal memory. The vivo X50 features just a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Xiaomi Note 7 Pro features just a bit better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same resolution camera and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.