Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a score of 78.7, which is just a bit better than vivo X50's 73 score. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro is a somewhat thicker and heavier device than vivo X50. These devices come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
Vivo X50 counts with a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than vivo X50, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Vivo X50 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X50 also has a greater amount of RAM. Vivo X50 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera, the vivo X50 also has a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features improved battery lifetime than vivo X50, because it has a 19% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.