Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X2 has an overall score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than vivo X50's overall score of 73. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco X2 has the newer 11 version while vivo X50 has Android 10 version, so it gives you lots of additional features. Even though the Xiaomi Poco X2 is better than vivo X50, we must tell that it's also thicker and heavier.
The vivo X50 counts with a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X50 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The vivo X50 has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density.
Vivo X50 features a superior storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Poco X2 has a little longer battery performance than vivo X50, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Poco X2 captures slightly better pictures and videos than vivo X50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a camera with much more megapixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.