Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is much better than the vivo X50, getting an 81.6 score against 73. Both phones we are comparing come with the same Android 10 OS. Despite being the best device in our current comparison, Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's design is thicker and somewhat heavier than the vivo X50. The vivo X50 features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X50 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a little more vivid display than vivo X50, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels number per inch of display, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X50, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution back camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with better battery duration than vivo X50, because it has a 23% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.