Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has an overall score of 82.4, which is much better than the vivo X50's 73 general score. Although it's the best device in this comparison review, we must note that it's also just a little heavier and just a little thicker. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a more recent 11 version while vivo X50 has Android 10 version.
The vivo X50 features a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X50 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a better display than vivo X50, because although it has a little bit worse display density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than vivo X50, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has improved battery performance than vivo X50, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro takes a little bit better pictures and videos than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.