Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | -- |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a global score of 77.1, which is just a bit better than the vivo X50's 73 global score. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has newer 11 version while vivo X50 has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations. Although it's the best in this comparison review, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's construction is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker than vivo X50.
The vivo X50 features a lot better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a brighter display than vivo X50, because it has a bit bigger display, a better 2080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit higher pixel quantity in each inch of screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G shoots slightly better videos and photos than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a much greater storage for apps and games than vivo X50, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features improved battery life than vivo X50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.